|
Post by sefi on May 20, 2006 10:03:44 GMT -5
So that's in about 6 hours time? Link to the TWoP Smallville forum page.
|
|
|
Post by Mary on May 20, 2006 14:27:32 GMT -5
The mods there deleted most of the pro-Lois questions. Oh, what was I expecting?
|
|
|
Post by chandrika on May 20, 2006 14:36:39 GMT -5
I am so fed and angry of the chloisers right now. they delete all the pro-lois questions and in the voting for who should be a couple next season they are clearing the cookies and keep voting. If Chlark happens then I am for sure quitting SV. Because it just proves the idiotic writers and producers have no respect for Lois and I don't wan't to watch a show which disrespects Lois.
|
|
|
Post by Jess on May 20, 2006 14:38:09 GMT -5
Man these people are worse than the worst Clanas on a bad day!
|
|
|
Post by LoisLaneKent on May 20, 2006 14:40:42 GMT -5
At least Clana was legit, dang I have lost all respect for these people.
|
|
|
Post by Mary on May 20, 2006 15:16:12 GMT -5
I like the Clanas, they actually have a sense of humour. On Sweet there is a new theory that Clark will die and Chloe will become Superman because she's been a hero more than anyone else this season. ;D
If Erica doesn't appear in all 22 episodes next season, then I'm done with SV. I'm fed up with the Chloe-worship.
|
|
|
Post by LoisLaneKent on May 20, 2006 15:41:11 GMT -5
Well I love both Chloe and Lois, but Chlo has to step aside and stop being Clark's babysitter.
|
|
|
Post by sefi on May 21, 2006 1:46:32 GMT -5
From TWOP
NoSupes:
My question for DeKnight is about Lois. Will Erica Durance be in all 22 episodes next year?
I don’t know what her contract calls for. I suspect it will be the same as the previous two seasons, which I believe was 13 eps or something like that.
|
|
|
Post by Jess on May 21, 2006 1:51:17 GMT -5
I read a couple of DeKnight's answers and yeah he doesn't seem to know much or know facts about the shows future anyway.....
|
|
|
Post by sefi on May 21, 2006 1:56:01 GMT -5
Smavillefanatic!Okay, I combed through the existing questions and didn’t see this specific question about Lois qua *Lois*…(because I’m not interested in Lois just as an extension of the “Chlois” theory or seeing the theory materialize into reality, but interested in Lois, her development in her own right) --What are these restrictions you’ve mentioned with respect to writing Lois, and do you anticipate them being lifted after the movie? Also not addressed, will we see Lois' backstory that might illuminate what made her this way, her family dynamics (relationship with her dad), and why she's so aimless (if something went wrong along the way)? Like Airisu, I realize there are restrictions, but wanted to ask specifically what those restrictions are (in part so we know when to blame the movie division and when to blame you guys and *specifically* about her backstory since it might help fill the characterization gaps of a character that couldn't be introduced until the fourth season. And also since you guys seem to do a great job with those backstory-episodes (Lineage,Pilot, Memoria), always look forward to them. Ah yes, the restrictions on Lois. When she was first introduced, our main restriction was that she could under no circumstances have any romantic relationship with Clark. Even if he were on Red K, no huggy no kissy no anything. This I believe still holds. Another restriction was that she couldn’t even have a scene with Lex. That has since been lifted, but I believe she can’t have any romance with him either. I'm not sure about the DP stuff, although I think there may be something about her not working there yet.
As for backstory about why she’s so aimless, I’m not sure if that’s part of the master plan. To me she’s just a young hellraiser trying to find her way. Which hopefully she’ll do soon.I don't know what to think about DeKnight. I just don't so yeah ...
|
|